4.16.2009

Dissent and Taxes

Today is tax day. If you’re hearing this for the first time, you have better things to do than read this post.

Due to an unusual circumstance at my paying job I was out of town yesterday and unable to complete this week’s installment of levity and sarcasm on time. I blame the Stimulus Bill. If only our clients hadn’t received their stimulus money I might have all the time in the world to sit on my couch musing about how much tea I could be sending to Washington. Damn that useless piece of legislation.

This past Sunday, U.S. Navy SEALs ended the five-day-old hostage situation with three rifle shots, freeing captured captain Richard Phillips. Congratulations on a happy ending. Let’s try to prevent this from happening again. Some pundits have called for an invasion of Somalia to take care of the pirate problem. I think there are several steps we can take before involving America in another war. For example, merchant vessels traveling through pirate-infested waters could hire private security, or, neighboring countries – perhaps funded by a third party – could hire private military contractors to seek out and destroy pirate vessels and property. I hear that Xe (formerly Blackwater Worldwide) is looking for work.

Some of the same pundits who are spoiling for another war also insist in labeling Somali pirates, terrorists. Let’s be perfectly clear about something. They are not terrorists. They are pirates. Words mean things. I know we’ve kind of let that slide for the past several years, but it’s important to remember. Someone who uses violence to achieve a political goal or make a political statement is a terrorist. Someone who hijacks a ship at sea and holds it for ransom is a pirate. Someone who shoots his wife and three kids, then turns the gun on himself is a coward and a criminal. All three are not the same. I know that it simplified the world-view of some if they can simply lump all the bad people into one category and nuke them all, but life is simply more complex than they may be comfortable with.

As mentioned previously, today is tax day. To celebrate, conservative activists held hundreds of little “tea parties” around the country today in protest of… well, let’s be honest, in protest of losing the election. Two hundred thirty-plus years ago, colonist snuck aboard British merchant vessels under cover of darkness and dumped tea into Boston harbor to protest British taxes levied against the colonists by a government in which they were not represented. This concept later morphed into the Revolutionary slogan, “No taxation without representation.” Apparently, some individuals attending these “tea parties” are under the impression that this is currently happening to them. Their impression is of course, false. American citizens are taxed WITH representation. That’s what those 535 congressmen and senators (well, 534 at the moment, ahem, Minnesota) in the big white building in Washington D.C. are there for, to represent you. I am taxed without representation, (as I am as yet unable to vote.) You are not. Other party attendees could be heard complaining to any open microphone they could find that the government “isn’t listening to (them).” Also not true. They’re actually just ignoring you. Sort of like your president did to them for the past eight years. Doesn’t feel so good, does it. You see, you had your say, a little over three months ago. Unfortunately for you, more people said something different, and their voices overwhelmed yours. That’s the way the system works in America. To co-opt and modify a phase coined by conservative commentator Charles Krauthammer in reference to the vilification of a previous president, the right in this country is suffering from Obama derangement syndrome, “the acute onset of paranoia in otherwise normal people in reaction to the policies, the presidency – nay – the very existence of Barack Obama.” Don’t get on television complaining about how the president is the anti-Christ and system is broken and doesn’t reflect the will of the people, because he’s not, it isn’t, and it does. Just be honest. You’re angry because you lost. There’s no shame in that. Keep sending in those teabags. I’m sure the homeless in Washington would love to drink something other than stale coffee and tap water for a few days.

The Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood, (read three guys in a basement with a fax machine) are demanding Burger King immediately pull a new advertisement featuring the King delivering a remix/parody of Sir Mix-A-Lot’s 90’s hit “Baby Got Back” titled, “I Like Square Butts.” According to the ad, if you purchase an adult BK Value Meal, you can get a BK Kids Meal featuring the one and only, SpongeBob SquarePants. The add is pretty funny, and the CCFC lacks any sense of humor, but maybe I was expecting too much from an organization that launched a letter-writing campaign in the age of e-mail, Twitter and text messages.

This past Monday, a passenger on board a twin-engine aircraft successfully landed the plane after the pilot died suddenly shortly after take-off. Seriously? This stuff actually happens in real life? Now it helps that said passenger also had his pilot’s license – albeit for much smaller aircraft – but even so, what are the odds that there would be a passenger with a pilot’s license on board a flight with a dead pilot? Somebody was definitely living right.

Finally this week, in an effort to regain some control over her image, Lindsay Lohan filmed a spoof eHarmony personal ad for Funny or Die this week in which she announces she is single and looking for love. Far too often celebrities forget how to poke fun at themselves and end up strung out, flat broke and starring in low rent B movies on SciFi Channel. For the last few years Lohan looked as though she were headed in that direction. But demonstrating the ability to laugh at one’s self indicates a level of maturity absent in many adults that might allow her to understand that there is more to life than the self-created fantasy world in which so many people in the entertainment industry seem to exist. Good job Lindsay. If you can remember to at least wear underwear when you pass out drunk in your car around town, it’s a step in the right direction.

9 comments:

Kristina said...

I'm proud of you...you discussed the tea parties without once calling them teabagging. Good for you. :) You are a bigger man than pretty much the rest of the media.
Is Blackwater really called Xe now? That is the worst name change since Prince changed his name to The Artist Formerly Know As Prince.
I hear there's a chocolate fountain in the cafe, so I think I'm going to have to go investigate that now.

DJ said...

Eh herm... I'm sorry, but uh I just thought I would bring this up since it seems to have been cast aside. Did Obama not promise in his campaign to "lower" taxes? In fact I remember Kristina telling me that one of the reasons she supported Obama was because you guys figured out your taxes were going to be lower under him than McCain. So, in essence you guys voted for lower taxes right? As did many other people.

Then why criticize people for protesting against high taxes when you voted for the same thing?

I find it very ironic that you villify republicans for protesting a democratic president when the democrats protested a republican president (Bush) for practically his whole presidency. And you say we're only protesting because "they lost"? Really? That's such a shallow misunderstanding of what these people are really and truely protesting. And even if that is true, how can you blame them for it when the democrats did it for 8 years? Pot, kettle, BLACK!

And as it is apparant that much of these people are taking time from work to protest for the very first time over something they feel passionate about, shouldn't you, as an American,congratulate them on their excercizing their freedom of speech for the first time?

No, of course not, we have to say they're protesting the fact that they lost... And since they're mostly conservatives and republicans, they can't possibly have any merit of truth to what they're saying...nevermind the fact that a number of democrats were joining in because they're not getting what they voted for. A small number of democrats, but democrats all the same.

I apologize if I'm coming across a little harsh, but after seeing what the "mainstream media" was saying about the tea parties... well it's just kind of obnoxious. I mean...what is it that they're cricizing anyway? Why make fun of people who are protesting? More importantly, why be so rude about it and going so far as to use the term "teabagging" in a live show... I mean, if Rush Limbaugh had used that to criticise democrats, or Obama, people in the mainstream would be going nuts and blowing gaskets etc etc etc...

And as a sidenote...I'm sure I've heard clips of Obama saying in his campaign speeches that he would cut federal spending... what a joke. He's already spent more on bailouts than bush spent on the war on terror.

And even if we had all voted for Obama, we would have perfectly legitimate reasons to protest because he's not delivering on his campain promises...promises, I might add, that got him voted into office in the first place!

So, in short, your accusations of us protesting because we lost are unwelcome if for no other reason than the fact that it would be hypocritical. I could be wrong, but at the tea party here in Burleson, I didn't exactly see any anti-obama posters... Most of them were protesting government spending and taxes...but I didn't go to it I was just passying by.

Anyways...I suppose I should say that even if we are protesting because we lost, don't we have every right to? Just saying... I mean, if you were addressing the issues that we're protesting against then that would be one thing, but instead you're kind of...well as you said, ignoring them. Well maybe not you specifically, but congressman and mainstream for sure.

Again, I find it very funny that the mainstream, instead of just reporting the news, decide to sling mud at the protesters. Makes me wonder why they would do that. Oh wait...I know...the mainstream has an agenda. And they're afraid of anyone speaking against that agenda. But what do I know?

Angela said...

I might be the least politically knowledgeable person who commonly reads/comments on this blog (which probably makes my point of view the most reflective of the masses), but I just have to post my silly little reply.

As far as I'm concerned, nobody - NOBODY - whines like a Republican. From up north (Canada) it looked as though people were unhappy with the Bush administration, but at least Democrats gave him a shot and got behind him at first. Then he started wars based on allegations, generally made the USA look like a bunch of blithering fools almost every time he was asked for more than one complete sentence, and oversaw the economy's steady decline into the toilet. That's worth some criticism, don't you think?

Republicans haven't even given Obama a shot. This guy hasn't even been in office for 100 days, and the GOP is ready to dance on his political grave. I saw a CNN poll the other day, and only 27% of Republicans presently support the Obama administraton. I think that's ridiculous. That kind of pack mentality really dulls the sharpness of general political discourse.

Despite Obama's genuine efforts to bridge the gap between red and blue in Washington (I don't think anybody can really dispute that he's tried to do so), it's really starting to look like a cheap version of West Side Story over there.

As far as I'm concerned, you can't spill milk all over the floor, expect me to clean it up, then complain about my method of cleaning. But hey. What do I know.

Mark said...

okay.

i didn't vote for lower taxes per se. it was a nice bonus, but i'm not a single issue voter. in fact, i'm not a voter.

i make fun of tea party protesters for the following reasons:

i don't believe taxes are too high. americans pay some of the lowest taxes in the industrialized world. and the idea that a 3% increase in the top income tax bracket transforms the country from the capitalist paradise it supposedly was under president bush into the soviet union is absolutely ABSURD.

they have no credibility. for eight years they sat around and watched president bush wage an unnecessary war and run up over a trillion dollars in debt and said absolutely nothing. if you're anti-government spending under a president you didn't vote for, shouldn't you also have been anti-government spending under a president you did vote for? i don't remember anyone throwing tea at bush's crawford ranch.

many of them have no idea what they are protesting. the boston tea party was a protest against taxation without representation, not taxation, and not government spending. if you're going to use the metaphor, use it correctly. if the oft-misquoted "founding fathers" had been opposed to taxation and government spending, they would have given congress the power to levee tariffs and taxes, provide for the common defense and promote the general welfare. what they wanted was the people to have a say in how much money was collected and how it was used. which is why we have these things called elections, in which citizens select representatives to decide how much money to collect and how to spend it. they had one opinion, more people had another. they lost. they're upset. it happens.

i am not "vilifying" anyone for protesting. we're just amused at their protest. you have to admit, spending good money on millions of bags of perfectly good tea and then dumping it in the water in the middle of a recession is pretty stupid. but notice how we haven't labeled them "anti-American" or "traitors," (though in the case of your governor the charge might be warranted)or "America-haters," like the right labeled anti-war protesters, or anyone who thought illegally spying on citizens might be a bad idea. i find the civility of the left in this matter refreshing. why make fun of people who are protesting? ask hannity and limbaugh and rumsfeld and rove. they're professionals.

you may not have seen any anti-obama signs in burleson (which i don't believe), but there were plenty (proportionately) in cincinatti and south carolina and washington. i'll send you a few of the pictures i've collected if you like.

people certainly have the right to protest if they are upset at the results of the election, or the direction of the government, or whatever else they want to protest. good for them. exercise that right to freedom of assembly and to petition the government for redress of grievances. but please accept my right to continue to point out the irony and absurdity of their protest. and please stop this "the mainstream media has an agenda" nonsense. (Please don't tell me you think Fox News is simply "reporting the news.) They didn't devote much coverage to these "parties" because the numbers (2000 in new york, city of 11 million for example) and in some cases the quality of the participants didn't warrant it. And cable news made fun of it because some individuals at the rallies set themselves up for it. get half a million people to show up on the mall in washington and they'll cover it like a serious protest.

Mark said...

...if you're going to use the metaphor, use it correctly. if the oft-misquoted "founding fathers" had been opposed to taxation and government spending, they WOULDN'T have given congress the power to levee tariffs and taxes, provide for the common defense and promote the general welfare... sorry.

Kristina said...

Two things:
Fox News was the first to use "teabagging" to describe what the protesters were doing, and plenty of GOPers used it after that, apparently without having any idea of its common alternative meaning. They shouldn't whine when people make fun of the fact that it didn't mean what they thought it meant. That's not being disrespectful, that's being funny.

I don't think Mark made this clear, but in fact, our taxes have been lowered, so win for us. Most of the protesters' taxes have been lowered (if they pay taxes: most protesters don't have jobs, Republican and Democrat alike). Even the highest tax brackets by 2012, will be lower than the holy Reagan's tax brackets, and I don't remember anyone protesting taxes during the Reagan administration.

Look, I think protest is a good thing. I think it can be a valuable tool in effecting change. I just don't think that you should a) give your protest an unfortunate nickname, b) use your protest to advocate illegal secession or c) use epithets you don't understand (like calling Obama a fascist). Protest intelligently.

Tiiu said...

haha...someone got told. lol Good blog !

Anonymous said...

Dammit, you see what you have done. I was content to sit on the sidelines and do my own thing, and now I have to actually do a little work and write my thoughts on the blog. Actually Mark, I gotta say thanks for giving me the forum to write this. I am far to lazy to do it myself.

Please allow me to address the bad feelings being generated by the previous comments. Mark, DJ and I were in the car that passed the protests. We were on our way to Taco Bell (I had the fresco burrito), and I did not see any anti-Obama signs either. What I did see was a lot of people upset with the current status of the country. Locally we have a conservative talk show host (Mark Davis) that is actually fair and balanced. Lets put it this way, Rush Limbaugh he ain’t. Anyway, his take on the protests was this, ”We are not protesting taxes, what we are protesting is the idea that the government is wasteful, arrogant, slow, and bulky. This is not Obama’s fault, yet, but as the head guy in charge he holds the responsibility.” When viewed under this light, what the protests were about is simply unhappiness. Just as the left would attack Bush for things outside of his prevue, so does the right attack the left. As a Texan I would also like to note that the local yokel you see being interviewed on the TV claiming Obama is going to take away his assault rifles is as representative of us (the right) as the poor single mother of two who said she is does not have to pay any more bills because Obama is president is representative of the left. (Run on sentence, but I am on a roll baby)

Now, one of my pet peeves is about the media. The right side claims that TV media is all about the left. The left claim radio media is all about the right. What both sides fail to account for is that the media in general is out to make money. Shows like John Stewart and The View are very biased, but they are not news shows. However, many people on both sides of politics forget this fact, but I dismiss these shows. When it comes to actual reporting, you have to remember CNN may have decided to appeal to liberal New York people. Foxnews has to compete and so they fulfill a need to appeal to the Midwest and south. So the assertion that the news is biased is true; however, not for some secret agenda, but for the simple matter ratings and money. Anderson Cooper’s comment about “teabagging” bugged me because of his arrogant approach. If you watch the clip he is condescending and dismissive. I can’t stand this attitude. Nothing makes me want to “bring out the pimpin’ hand” more then a condescending attitude. I thought Anderson Cooper saying, “you can’t talk while teabagging” is funny as hell though.

Mark, I also must disagree with you on one statement you made in your previous post. You made the statement, “What the Bush administration never understood, and what the conservative movement by extension continues to misunderstand, is that the rest of the world is fully aware that the United States is the most powerful nation on earth.” The sad reality is that USA is losing its status as the world superpower. The majority of Americans like teenagers of rich parents, who have never had to work for what they have. When you take a step back and look at other countries, their standard of living has increased dramatically over the last decade. Now we see India and Brazil with a healthy working middle class. We see China with a growing group of citizens that have extra money to burn and a voracious appetite for consumer goods. Yet, instead of trading and working with these countries to better ourselves, many Americans hold on the belief that we need to implement protectionism and “keep American jobs in America.” I must hold my nose at that previous statement in quotes, the smell of bullshit emanates from by screen just by typing it. I was under the assumption that Obama was a ballsy guy. Instead of telling GM, “you guys suck, no money here.” We get a massive bailout. Instead of retooling Freddie Mac and Fanny Mae, which would risk lower income people from getting loans, we get the bank bailout with a nod and wink. Instead of telling Columbia we would be happy to trade with them, thusly lowering our food prices and inviting other South American countries to begin trade talks, we tell Columbia no free trade because they use a harsh approach with terrorists who use gorilla style tactics. Really??? Tell you what, how about you, the leaders in congress, be concerned with America and let Columbia deal with Columbia. Instead of bettering America we hold in back for the sake of a few. In the Columbia example we hold the nation back for a few farmers who grow sugar beets. I see this pattern over and over again. The problem is that Americans have lost their nerve to implement these solutions that would again push America to the forefront of the world.

On a personal level, I am tired of the fear. I am tired of the whining. I am tired of all the name-calling. You say I am whining, and then I call myself exuberant. You call me misinformed, and then I call you confused. So, my only choice is to sit on my ass and smoke pot while I listen to Green Day and dream of unicorns and rainbows. Unfortunately, I am a grownup and can’t do this. So I do the best I can. I attempt to educate those around me, and hope that my impact can make a small difference in the lives of my children and their generation. But unless we as Americans are willing to understand that the function of the government is to provide an environment for growth, not the actual growth, then we are all screwed.

I put my email address at the bottom of this comment turned dissertation. I welcome all questions and comments. There is nothing I love more then the sharing of ideas. I may not agree with you but I would love to try and understand you.

chris@drbarroso.com

Chris Barroso said...

I am not sure how my name became "E commerce book." I think it was because I marinate daily in E Scholar from Google. Whatever, It was me that wrote the comment above.