11.06.2008

The Day After

For the past 24 hours I’ve been trying to think of something worthy to write. I’ve come up with nothing. It seems as though I lack the vocabulary necessary to express the magnitude of what happened Tuesday night. There were many things I planned to say in the event of an Obama victory, many more in the event of a McCain comeback. But very few of them now seem big enough for the moment.

So, instead of trying to cobble together something that may or may not resemble coherent writing, I’ve decided to try something else. In this post I’ll share some of my thoughts about the election and other items in the news this past week. Then on Friday, after I’ve had a chance to digest it, I’ll offer my thoughts on the meaning of this election.

First, to state the obvious. At 11:00 p.m. Tuesday, November 4th, 2008, Senator Barack Obama defeated Senator John McCain to become the 44th President Elect of the United States of America.

North Carolina and Missouri have still not completed counting their votes. But at this point, that doesn’t matter. Despite record voter turnout, both Florida and Ohio somehow managed to conduct an election cleanly and efficiently, without any major technical difficulties. That in and of itself has got to be some kind of miracle.

A mea culpa. I have always believed that America would elect a female president before a black president. Obviously, I was wrong. I apologize.

Many interesting images from Tuesday night that will remain with me for some time to come;

Kudos to John McCain for one of the classiest concession speeches I’ve ever heard. Obviously a difficult, emotional moment for him, handled with the stoicism and grace befitting a U.S. Senator and military man.

Contrast the crowd at the McCain rally with the crowd at the Obama rally. One of them resembled my neighborhood, one of them didn’t.

It was moving to see all the people in all the crowds nationwide who broke down in tears at the announcement of Obama’s victory. It was the first time I can remember seeing Jesse Jackson speechless. Oprah sounded about as delirious and incomprehensible as Kevin Garnett did the night the Celtics won the NBA title. In Times Square, a tall smiling black man turned to the two young white women standing beside him and embraced them, as they embraced him. But the image I think I will remember most was that of ABC News anchor Charles Gibson holding back tears as he watched the reaction around the world and tried to describe the emotions present in what he was seeing. Gibson is a hardened old news man. He’s covered wars and famines and celebrations and other presidential elections, all without betraying his emotions. The fact that he was unable to do so in this instance speaks volumes to the significance of that moment.

Kenya has declared November 4th, Obama Day.

Can we please, please, PLEASE get rid of this ridiculous electoral college? I'm told that the electoral college was originally conceived to prevent large urban population centers in certain regions of the country from dominating national politics. So instead, every four years, the rest of the country is held hostage for 10 months by six undecided yahoos in Ohio and the world shuffleboard champion retirement community in the southwest suburbs of Orlando. Why on earth can we not just send the candidate with the most votes to the White House? Why do we insist on making things so much more difficult than they need to be?

On Tuesday night the longest presidential campaign in history came to an end. I tried desperately to come up with a list of things I will miss about the campaign. I failed miserably. But I did find a few things I certainly WILL NOT miss.

1. Polls. I don’t want to hear about polls until 2012. Numbers, internals, sampling sizes, margins of error, I’m tired of it all and I want it to go away. For the next 3 1/2 years, I don’t want to hear the word mentioned unless it is preceded by the word telephone, or followed by the word vault.

2. Joe the Plumber. What did we do to deserve to have this fraud perpetrated upon us? You know what, on second thought, I don’t care. Joe is just trying to make a name for himself the good old-fashioned time-honored American way, by hiring and agent and attempting to parlay his fifteen seconds of fame and three weeks of campaign infamy into a book deal, Congressional run and country music recording contract. He is doing his best to ensure that he will ultimately be negatively affected by President-elect Obama’s tax plan. Who among us wouldn’t do the same?

3. The triumph of the ordinary over the extraordinary. This is intricately related to the previous item. There was nothing special about Joe Wurtzelbacher. He assembled pipes for a living. Nothing wrong with that. But nothing special either. Yet in his desperate search for a horse to hitch his campaign to, McCain elevated Joe to a stature greater than even that of his own. He became Joe the Symbol, the jingle for the absurd concept that if we simply eliminated taxes we could all wake up tomorrow in some capitalist utopia where everyone is a satisfied self-employed millionaire, and the rest of the world cowers in fear and grovels at our feet. The problem is that there was nothing special about Joe Wurtzelbacher. And when we elevated ordinary people to the status of heroes, we diminish real heroes - like John McCain. Heroes perform above and beyond the call of duty. John McCain chose to remain in captivity, rather than go home and leave his fellow soldiers to their fate in that Vietnamese prison. Yet for some reason, he allowed the non-story of some guy asking a question to overshadow the story of his own very real accomplishments.

4. The CNN “Magic Wall”. If you’re going to construct a gigantic video screen on which to display pretty little graphics and flashing lights, make sure you can fit the whole thing on screen in a single shot. Poor design.

5. The “Bradley Effect”. Do some people tell pollsters they will vote for a black candidate, then do the opposite in the solace of the voting booth? I don’t know. But the day before the election, polling indicated that Obama held a less than one percent lead over McCain in my state of Indiana - a state which had not voted for a Democrat, let alone a black man, in almost half-a-century. Analysis of the numbers the day after the election shows that Obama carried Indiana by less that one percent. This is not the same country in which Tom Bradley ran for mayor 26 years ago.

Finally, one of the most important outcomes of this election is the repudiation of the politics of fear and personal destruction. Karl Rove was not the first political operative to engineer a presidential campaign based on the fear and loathing of one’s opponent. But his campaigns were arguably some of the most effective. Rick Davis attempted the same thing against Barack Obama on behalf of John McCain. And the result is confirmation of his utter failure. From day one of the general election campaign, McCain’s strategists looked at the political landscape and knew they had little to no substance to run on. So they designed a campaign that would spend much - if not most - of it’s time attempting to tear down the opponent. They threw every single frightening label at Obama hoping something would stick. They called him unpatriotic, elitist, mysterious and risky. They called him a Muslim, a socialist, a radical and a terrorist sympathizer. They accused him of associating with militants, bombers, racists and nationalists. They insinuated that he was unqualified, and dangerous, anti-American and simply “not like us.” They ran a a campaign filled with “we don’t know” and “he might be” and “there’s no evidence”. It would have been so easy for people to be overwhelmed by the negativity and run screaming at the sight of their own shadows. But at least 62 million people stood up and said to Karl Rove and Rick Davis that we may not know everything we want to know about Barack Obama, but we will not be coerced into loathing, or controlled by our fear of another American citizen. Not this time. To paraphrase Vice President-elect Joe Biden, for 22 months they called Barack Obama every name they could think of. Now they can call him President of the United States of America.

4 comments:

Kristina said...

Nice. Agree.

The only thing I would add is that despite the incredible step forward that this represents, three states voted to extend bigotry toward gays a little more than before. I find it amazing that the people who voted for Obama, Democrats mostly, still managed to find a way to deny gays the ability to get married in California, Arizona and Florida.

I hope that the people who fought against these ridiculous propositions don't quit fighting because of this setback. If nothing else, this election should teach them that it takes a LONG time to step ahead of hate and prejudice, but when you do, oh, how sweet it is!

Quizsic said...

Two thoughts, one which will be popular and one will not be. I'll start with the popular:

"Kudos to John McCain for one of the classiest concession speeches I’ve ever heard." I couldn't agree more. He was damned near decent, and while his campaign deserves a lot of criticism, his concession deserves a lot of respect.

"Can we please, please, PLEASE get rid of this ridiculous electoral college?" Okay, this is the unpopular one, because I still believe strongly in the Electoral College. It has two functions: stop big population centers from controlling elections and inflate a small victory into a large one. In every election in recent memory, it has worked beautifully. The US has achieved one of the most stable democracies on the planet and the Electoral College is one reason why. Obama won a 6% lead in the popular vote Tuesday, but a 2-1 victory in the Electoral College. It elevates his popular vote victory and allows the country to turn that victory into a mandate. That effect cannot be underestimated. Eliminate the Electoral College and our country would be more fractured, more argumentative than it is today.

But that's just my $0.02 - I expect change. :)

GWG

Angela said...

"For the first time, I am truly proud of America". Hopefully now we can clearly see what Michelle Obama was talking about when she mentioned true American pride. Pride in one's country is not something ingrained into a person. At least not these days. For me, pride in my country (disclaimer: I'm Canadian) comes from watching my country defy the odds, challenge the status quo, and take a risk on the improbable. I am so privileged to see America do this in the younger part of my life.

President-Elect Obama has always realized that this election was bigger than him. At all times, he knew that he was putting his race, his cultural heritage, his affiliations, his ideologies and his youth on trial before the world. And when America chose him in spite of them (or hopefully because of them), he responded not with pride, not with triumphance, but with a somber sense of humility.

President-Elect Obama knows, and has always known, that an entire generation and race is going to hold him accountable for his presidential term. And vice versa. This is part of why I think that Obama was the very best choice for America. He will tread carefully and with great deliberation, because he understands what and who is now representing.

I am absolutely positive that my Political Science professor at my undergraduate university is now developing an entire course based on the strategy and execution of the Obama-Biden campaign. The way it was run was almost flawless, and those behind it deserve much more praise then they have received.

I am so proud to be alive at this time in history, and to live in this continent. I know that it has been said ad nauseam already, but we have witnessed history. To progress from a mortal fear of anything remotely foreign in 2001 all the way to electing Barack Obama President in only seven years is nothing short of remarkable.

"Yes we can"? Yes we did.

Shoofly said...

"one of the most important outcomes of this election is the repudiation of the politics of fear and personal destruction."

May it be so, Mark. Good post.

Kristina; my interest has been picqued by the same item - but bigotry towards gays is a deep running thing and for many people it is a completely crazy thing to support (I'd like to see these minds opened and changed); and while the current voting pool may seem to be progressive in some terms, if we can especially assume that there's been a greater minority vote as well; I've found that that this is a population especially not keen on gay rights.

I'd like to think that inclusion is inclusion - and it's easier to imagine inclusion from this side of the election, than from the "fear and personal destruction" side of the coin... Mark, truly this is the part that I've hated most.